The Mind Alcove:
Robin Reilly
The Arts
The Arts: a necessary part of life.
These are the parts of life that truly hold our hearts and let our souls breathe. This page is dedicated to celebrating the arts, examining the minds behind the art we admire, and simply being in its presence.
Article Index (Please click to be directed to your chosen article)
Considering contexts of reception and production, and with reference to wider reading, compare and contrast the ways in which Oscar Wilde and Alice Walker present their protagonists’ experiences of oppression in The Picture of Dorian Gray and The Color Purple.
“Oppression,” according to the Oxford dictionary, is the “prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or exercise” of an individual. This notion lies at the heart of both texts: Dorian experiences covert, psychological oppression, shaped by Victorian obsessions with morality and vanity, and embodied in Lord Henry’s seemingly benign yet ultimately manipulative mentorship. In contrast, Walker depicts overt, physical oppression, inflicted by Celie’s male family members and rooted in religion, racism, and patriarchal authority. Both authors explore how these experiences impact identity: Celie, initially rendered compliant and meek, gradually gains self-empowerment through female solidarity and liberative self-discovery; in contrast, Dorian’s subtler ideological oppression drives him toward moral demise and self-destruction, as reflected in his increasingly grotesque portrait, which bears the sins of his soul. This contrast underscores how both texts ultimately link experiences of oppression to outcomes of agency or moral collapse, suggesting that emancipation emerges not simply from circumstance but through self-awareness and the capacity for inner transformation.
The nature of the protagonists’ oppression in both texts contrasts sharply: in The Color Purple, set in the Georgian Jim Crow South, Walker presents the “extreme barbarity” of Celie’s “male domination,” vividly illustrated through verbal and physical abuse. Her husband Albert's listing of the pejoratives “you black, you pore, you ugly, you a woman,” dehumanizes every facet of her identity while the asyndeton’s staccato rhythm amplifies the harshness of his words. The specific attack on her “black[ness],” despite his own Black identity, and the deliberate misspelling of “pore” ironically highlight his racial and socioeconomic marginalisation under the same racially oppressive structures as Celie, potentially rendering his cruelty a projection of his own insecurities. Moreover, Albert’s tirade encapsulates Bailey’s concept of “misogynoir” — the intersection of racism and misogyny targeting Black women, and rooted in their historical subjugation within “racially discriminatory” and “patriarchal structures.” This is starkly reflected in Albert’s gendered and summative declaration: “You a woman. Goddamn, you nothing at all,” deeming Celie’s womanhood the ultimate basis for her supposed worthlessness. The diminishing effects of this abuse are evident in Celie’s bleak admission, “I don’t fight, I stay where I’m told,” illustrating a passive and conditioned identity.
This depiction of overt verbal abuse is intensified by Walker’s portrayal of sexual abuse, inflicted by Celie’s father, “Pa,” and conveyed in the hauntingly prosaic line, “First he put his thing up gainst my hip.” The euphemistic “thing” (genitalia) reflects Celie’s childlike innocence, while the first-person narration denies readers distance from her trauma, drawing them into her suffering in an intimate and harrowing way. The animalistic imagery, “grab” and “cram me up tween his legs,” explicitly convey violent penetration and rape, while Celie’s reaction, “to cry” whenever Pa asked her to “trim his hair,” reveals how a seemingly innocuous act became a ritual precursor to sexual abuse. Such disturbing portrayals of Black male brutality triggered significant “controversy” from contemporary readers, particularly among African American men, culminating in the NAACP’s “boycott” of Spielberg’s 1985 film adaptation. While “grossing over $94 million,” it had been deemed a “dangerous” “hate letter to black men” — a reaction Smith correlates to Walker’s naming of the “unnameable: that Black women have at times been brutally and matter-of-factly oppressed by Black men.” Perhaps this “unnamable” element stems from the historical context of slavery, where White-on-Black oppression may have overshadowed Black ‘intraracial violence,’ fostering an unspoken pressure to emphasise a narrative of solidarity against a shared White oppressor. Walker skillfully engages with these tensions through a layered narrative, whereby Celie’s intraracial abuse is paralleled with the racialised Jim Crow South and the patriarchal African Olinka tribe, thereby crafting both a powerful racial and feminist critique, with its epicentre rooted in Celie’s personal, explicit abuse.
In contrast to Walker’s portrayal of Celie’s overt physical persecution, Wilde presents a far more subtle yet arguably equally intrusive form of oppression, as Lord Henry deceivingly guides Dorian into a debauched empiricism — a “subversive philosophy” when considered within 19th-century “Victorian morality.” Lord Henry embodies the unrestrained voice of indulgent aestheticism, demonstrated in the exclamative aphorism, “Youth! Youth! There is nothing in the world but youth!” and the imperative: “Be always searching for new sensations,” glorifying vanity and empirical values. By naming Dorian the “visible symbol” of the “century’s” pleasures, Wilde skillfully highlights Lord Henry’s manipulative aggrandisement, executed through epistemological aphorisms. Additionally, the envious confession, “I wish I could change places with you…it [the world] will always worship you,” exposes the self-serving “enjoyment and edification” Lord Henry derives from his “twisted pedagogical interest” in Dorian, who becomes a vicarious conduit and “experimental method” through which his mentor’s hedonistic ideals are enacted without personal consequence. While the language in The Color Purple functions to immediately dehumanize, in The Picture of Dorian Gray, it is veiled in flattery, facilitating a more unsettling indoctrination. This is exemplified in Dorian’s parroting of “youth” as the “only thing worth having”: a reaction Rashkin persuasively equates to “psychological child abuse” and what is essentially, grooming. Moreover, the imagery of a “secret chord touched,” with “chord” serving as a metaphor for a private and “secret” area of Dorian’s soul, suggests both a romanticised awakening and corrupt intrusion by Lord Henry. The sensory verb “touch[ed]” evokes a physical, potentially sexual, transgression, yet remains ambiguous in its metaphorical form — in stark contrast to Celie’s explicit rape and verbal abuse — cultivating a subtly erotic undertone that may disturbingly reflect Wilde’s own “appalling antics” during the 1890s, involving “a procession of teenage boys” whom he “paid for sex” and “groom[ed].”
Lord Henry’s psychological dominance over Dorian is most explicitly expressed through the anatomical imagery of Dorian’s “siege[d]” and “dimly conscious” “brain,” suggesting a sinister cognitive paralysis. Indeed as Davies observes, beneath the facade of flattery, a “struggle over biological life” takes over. Thus, while Walker depicts conventional verbal oppression as brutally diminishing Celie’s sense of self, Wilde presents an unconventional aggrandizement that interferes with Dorian’s psyche, inflating his vanity and hubris to the point of moral erasure. This manifests in Dorian’s wish for eternal youth, which modern readers may interpret as a Faustian bargain, with Lord Henry as a “Mephistophelian” tempter enticing Dorian to sacrifice morality for beauty. This dynamic subverts Victorian beliefs in “physiognomy,” since Dorian’s beauty becomes associated not with inner virtue but with corruption. Ultimately, through their divergent experiences of oppression, a clear contrast emerges between Dorian’s pernicious psychological manipulation and Celie’s brutal, overt abuse.
The protagonist’s response to this oppression, however, is perhaps determined as much by their relationships with others as by the abuse itself. In The Color Purple, Albert brings Shug — his former lover and successful blues singer — into his home, forcing Celie to nurse her through illness. This leads to a romantic relationship between the two, catalysing Celie’s resistance against Albert as Shug transforms her passivity into agency. Celie’s initial acquiescence toward her oppressors is depicted as a consequence of internalised religious obedience, insinuated through her epistolary appeals to God for a “sign” to justify her rape and her poignant insistence on being a “good girl.” Thus, Walker casts God as a metaphysical extension of Celie’s abusers, whose favour she feels she must earn, illustrating how religious piety traps her in a state of paralyzing submission. Shug dismantles this dynamic as her love and spiritual guidance lift Celie from passivity and danger, later offering her home in Tennessee as a safe haven. Confiding in Shug, Celie admits that she had “nobody ever love me,” to which Shug replies, “I love you, Miss Celie,” marking Celie’s first genuine experience of romantic love and intimacy. Furthermore, Shug’s aphorism, “God is inside you…everybody and everything,” instils a newfound sense of self-worth and agency, reframing God from a distant authoritarian to an all-encompassing force of redemption.
Some critics such as Harris however, have labelled Celie and Shug’s relationship as “the height of silly romanticism.” While this may grossly understate Shug’s influence, it remains valuable in illuminating the cultural context of Walker’s 1980s publication, when homosexuality was largely absent from mainstream African American literature. Walker’s depiction of Black queer women was therefore “groundbreaking” to contemporary readers, helping to explain why critics like Harris may have trivialised their relationship — a tendency echoed in what Kael terms the “soft-pedal[ling]” of their bond in the film adaptation. Modern readers, less constrained by prejudice regarding sexual orientation, may recognise the more persuasive reading of Shug’s role as the “chief agency of redemption,” guiding Celie toward a liberative faith that ultimately releases her from oppression. Walker demonstrates this as Celie reflects on her shift “away from the old white man [God]” toward “trees,” “air” and “birds” — lexically progressive imagery which signal her embrace of an empowering, nature-based faith. Moreover, Walker's decision to end Celie’s epistolary correspondence with God may be informed by her own pantheistic sensibility and veneration for “Mother Earth” over traditional religion. In addition, Celie’s defiance, “seem[ing] to come…from the trees” further emphasises pantheism as the spiritual force underpinning her resistance. Finally, Walker employs antithesis in the metaphorical proclamation “it’s time to leave you [Albert] and enter into the creation,” to powerfully convey Celie’s transformation from a passive endurer of abuse to a confident agent of her own life, with “creation” signifying new beginnings and the creative freedoms she gains upon moving in with Shug.
While Walker depicts Celie’s relationship with Shug as an empowering force that enables her to confront and leave her abuser, Wilde, by contrast, portrays Dorian’s rejection of his lover as the catalyst for his deeper submission to Lord Henry’s manipulation, and the beginning of a self-imposed corruption. When the Shakespearean actress Sibyl Vane fails to perform her romantic roles convincingly, viewing them as false due to her genuine love for Dorian, he cruelly rejects her, precipitating her suicide. Dorian’s demeaning epithets “shallow” and “stupid” illustrate his callous rejection of Sibyl, while the cynical statement “you simply produce no effect” demonstrates his reduction of her worth to mere aesthetic function, cruelly rendering her obsolete once she fails to act. Wilde may be critiquing “art for art's sake,” as Dorian is incapable of acknowledging Sibyl’s love for him, judging her purely through an artistic lens. His repudiation marks what Brinkley terms the “first experiment” in his hedonistic indulgences as he proceeds to corrupt countless men within his environment, his moral decay increasingly transferring to, and disfiguring his portrait as a result. Ironically, Dorian’s perception of Sibyl is redolent of Lord Henry’s view of him: a source of hedonistic pleasure rather than a person of intrinsic value. This superficiality contrasts sharply with Celie and Shug’s bond, grounded in genuine love and care.
Despite driving Sibyl to suicide, Dorian appears to retain some level of moral awareness, evident in his guiltful reflection that “she will never come to life again” while “burying his face into his hands,” evoking grief and a recognition of the harm he has caused. However, this conscience quickly dissipates under the “overpowering…authority” of Lord Henry who asserts she “never really lived” nor “died” due to her occupation as an actor. Dorian’s immediate shift in perception, viewing death as “a marvelous experience,” unnervingly reframes tragedy as hedonistic pleasure. This sinister romanticisation, reinforced by Wilde’s use of proxemics as Lord Henry “lean[s] over[head],” marks the moment Dorian abandons morality, sadistically deriving gratification from his lover’s death while rejecting Basil Hallward’s claim that “love is…more wonderful…than art.” Thus, Lord Henry successfully undermines emotional connection, blocking Dorian’s chance for salvation, in stark contrast to Celie, who embraces her love for Shug without constraint, freeing herself from Albert. The destructive consequences of Lord Henry’s interference are evident in Dorian’s “enamour[ment]” with the “corruption of his own soul,” as he tragically celebrates his own moral decay, his identity now enmeshed with a quasi-religious faith in empiricism. Ultimately, while Walker illustrates how meaningful connection and spirituality enable Celie to confront and leave Albert, Wilde poignantly presents Dorian’s rejection of love — furthered by Lord Henry — as a devastating point of no return, where ideological oppression shifts from external imposition to self-perpetuation.
This distinction is most prominent in the protagonists’ final acts where, while Dorian succumbs to destructive and irreparable corruption, Celie attains profound “empowerment and liberation” through her gracious forgiveness of her oppressor and powerful reclamation of her life as her own. After leaving Albert, Celie begins her dressmaking business, sewing and selling pants; the “orders com[ing] in from everywhere” and Shug’s reassurance “you making your living” signify economic self-sufficiency. Contextually, in the 1930s-40s, Black women comprised “8%” of the manufacturing workforce, rendering Celie's business an extraordinary achievement “against the forces of sexism and racism.” Walker deliberately centres Celie’s business on pant-making to subvert Albert’s assertion that “men spose to wear the pants”: an extended metaphor for male domination. Celie’s self-sufficiency is further emphasised through her growing emotional independence. Initially, Shug’s infidelity provokes anger in Celie, who admits, “I could scratch her hair…off,” while Shug’s departure, equated with “happiness desert[ing],” highlights Celie’s emotional co-dependency. Yet, the reflective internal monologue “who am I to tell her who to love?” and the commitment to love her “true and good” without control marks a pivotal shift, as Celie recognises that love does not require the ownership that has defined her previous relationships with her father and husband. This evolution reflects Walker’s broader moral agenda, described by Steinem as “an organic morality of dignity, autonomy and balance,” culminating in Celie’s calm acceptance: “If she come [back], I be happy. If she don’t, I be content,” conveying a newfound emotional independence. This self-healing is accentuated through two separate acts of reclamation. After inheriting Pa’s house, Celie burns cedar, purifying it and “chasing out all evil.” As Lewis T.W. observes, this ritual exemplifies “remarkable…moral mapping,” as “one ambience is dismantled and another constructed,” Celie transforming the house from a site tainted with patriarchal domination and sexual abuse into a space of her own authority. Secondly, Walker skillfully mirrors this dynamic in Celie’s reconciliation with Albert who she forgives and teaches to sew, “hostility vanish[ing]” as a “bitterness between the sexes” transforms into “mutuality and reciprocity,” the two bonding over their shared love for Shug as “two old fools left from love.”
Whereas Celie grows through forgiveness and self-sufficiency, Dorian succumbs to moral decay and is consumed by violent indulgence. By the novel’s end, his hedonism reaches unprecedented extremes as he projects corruption onto others, leaving “the stage [metaphorically] strewn with…bodies of the innocent.” Basil’s pleas to understand Dorian’s behaviour lead him to reveal his portrait in the attic — a symbol of madness in Victorian gothic literature, further emphasised by Dorian’s deranged “smil[ing]” and “laugh[ing].” This also alludes to the Victorian gothic double as Dorian’s descent into an evil counterpart seems to manifest in his physical expressions. The abstract and psychological nature of Dorian’s abuse prevents him from recognising his true abuser, instead mislabeling Basil, who represents genuine love, as “the origin of all his shame.” Conversely, Celie’s experiences of overt violence enables her to clearly differentiate between her oppressors and Shug, whose love, unlike Basil's, is welcomed, facilitating Celie’s path to autonomy. Crucially, J.M. Stoddart’s editorial censorship of “homosexual” allusions in The Picture of Dorian Gray, obscures the potential romantic relationship between Basil and Dorian, reflecting Victorian conservatism and prejudice when “private homosexual acts” remained criminalised until 1967. A century between their publications, Walker’s modern context grants her freedoms of homosexual representation unavailable to Wilde. Nevertheless, Basil’s care for Dorian is evident in his attempt to save him through prayer. The chiasmus — “the prayer of your pride has been answered. The prayer of your repentance will be also” — conveys the fragile balance between Dorian's destructive lifestyle and his final opportunity for redemption. Yet, Wilde renders this chance unattainable, as Dorian, consumed by an “uncontrollable…hatred” murders Basil, illustrating how he can no longer control his hedonistic impulses. Thus, Dorian twice rejects redemptive love, in sharp contrast to Celie’s wholehearted embrace of Shug’s. The repetition of “stabbing..again and again” evokes the brutal and visceral nature of Dorian’s murder, while the third-person narration that “youth had spoiled him” reinforces his irreversible moral demise.
Finally, Wilde presents Dorian’s ultimate act of “stabbing” his own portrait as a futile attempt to break free from corruption and attain “peace.” Heavily influenced by Huysmans’ “Against Nature,” Wilde mirrors the protagonist's realisation that escape from suffering may only be found in a return to society. However, Wilde presents Dorian’s act not as liberative but irreparably destructive, as his sins transfer onto his body, leaving him dead and “withered,” unable to escape the consequences of his hedonism or reintegrate into society. While his death might be interpreted as a form of emancipatory rebellion, ending the Faustian pact that has hitherto bound him to his oppressor, this rebellion is ultimately hollow, arising not from a personal reclamation of power, as Celie’s does, but from the complete subsumption of his identity by his mentor’s empiricism. He is uncontrollably driven, rather than chooses, to kill himself, rendering his suicide symbolic of psychological enslavement rather than a conscious attempt at liberation, reaffirming his tragic role as a powerless experimentee. Whilst Celie’s life is defined by a flourishing and progressively revitalised sense of self, Dorian’s is sinisterly exploited, his identity gradually encroached upon until he is displaced from himself. His fatal failure to achieve redemption underscores Wilde’s didactic warning against the dangers of extreme aestheticism, a caution directed not only at readers but, arguably, at Lord Henry himself. Ultimately, while Walker portrays Celie’s navigation of her abuse as a transformative journey culminating in self-sufficiency and reconciliation, Wilde depicts Dorian as unable to recognise his true oppressor or reconcile his fractured soul, leading to his tragic self-destruction.
In conclusion, both Wilde and Walker explore their protagonists’ experiences of oppression through the neglect imposed by those closest to them. While Celie endures overt physical and verbal abuse from her father and husband, Wilde presents a subtler, psychological oppression through the surreptitious and Machiavellian influence of his mentor, who grooms him into a life of hedonism. Walker depicts a transformative response: Celie confronts and ultimately reconciles with her abuser, experiencing a “flowering of awareness” through Shug’s love and pantheism, attaining emotional and economic self-sufficiency. By contrast, Wilde presents a more haunting trajectory as Dorian “disintegrates” under Lord Henry’s influence, unable to sustain “a credible, coping self.” In this way, Celie achieves a kind of self-unification that Dorian fatally lacks; unable to reconcile his moral conscience with his indulgent desires, he dies a fragmented man, revealing Wilde’s moral warning against elevating desire above ethical responsibility. Ultimately, both authors suggest that the path to freedom from oppression lies in achieving personal wholeness, a feat Celie accomplishes, while Dorian appears fated to fail, his identity obliterated and subsumed with Lord Henry’s intoxicating dogma.
Word Count: 3120
Bibliography
Primary Texts:
Walker, Alice. The Color Purple. 1982. Reprint, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1982.
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. 1891. Reprint, London: Penguin Books, 2000.
Secondary Sources:
Ahmad Saeed Hosni, Ahmad. “Black Women under Male Chauvinism in Alice Walker’s the Color Purple.” Journal of Qena Faculty of Arts , October 2025. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_466729_11d680bd5f09b374fd6d6d43e6773485.pdf.
andotherworlds. “Oscar Wilde: The Chronicles of an Aesthete - Andotherworlds - Medium.” Medium. Medium, March 27, 2021. https://andotherworlds.medium.com/oscar-wilde-the-chronicles-of-an-aesthete-3c979b5c2674
Bailey, Moya. MISOGYNOIR TRANSFORMED : Black Womens Digital Resistance. S.L.: New York University Press, 2022.Bailey, Moya . Misogynoir Transformed Black Women’s Digital Resistance. NYU Press. NYU Press, 2021. https://nyupress.org/9781479865109/misogynoir-transformed/.
Bobo, Jacqueline. “Sifting through the Controversy: Reading the Color Purple.” Callaloo 39, no. 39 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/2931568.
Boneva, Bozhidara . “RULES of LOVE in ALICE WALKER’S the COLOR PURPLE .” Research Papers of Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv – Languages and Literature 55, no. Book 1 (Part C) (2017). https://ntffpu.uni-plovdiv.bg/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/023_B_Boneva_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B42-%D0%90.pdf.
Brinkley, Edward S. “Homosexuality as (Anti)Illness: Oscar Wilde’s the Picture of Dorian Gray and Gabriele D’Annunzio’s Il Piacere.” Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature 22, no. 1 (January 1, 1998). https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1434.
Claypole, Jonty, and Sophie Gee. “Oscar Wilde 3: ‘a Handbag?!’ the Importance of Being Earnest.” Secret Life of Books , June 10, 2025. https://www.globalplayer.com/podcasts/episodes/7Drs9Xy/.
Davies, Jessica Leigh. “Life Expectancies: Late Victorian Literature and the Biopolitics of Empire.” Escholarship.org, 2017. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4q9637xg.
dictionary.cambridge.org. “PANTHEISM | Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary,” n.d. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pantheism.
famous-trials.com. “Testimony of Oscar Wilde on Cross Examination (April 3,1895)(Literary Part),” n.d. https://famous-trials.com/wilde/346-literarypart.
Flood, Alison. “Uncensored Picture of Dorian Gray Published.” The Guardian, April 27, 2011. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/apr/27/dorian-gray-oscar-wilde-uncensored.
Harris, Trudier. “On the Color Purple, Stereotypes, and Silence.” Black American Literature Forum 18, no. 4 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2904291.
Kael, Pauline . “SACRED MONSTERS.” The New Yorker, December 23, 1985. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1985/12/30/sacred-monsters.
Kaplan, M. Lindsay. “The Christian Origins of Racism.” The Marginalia Review of Books, February 26, 2021. https://themarginaliareview.com/the-christian-origins-of-racism/.
Lennox, Sarah. “Physiognomy in Victorian Beauty Manuals.” Victorian Review 42, no. 1 (2016). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26809549.
Liebman, Sheldon W. “Character Design in ‘the Picture of Dorian Gray.’” Studies in the Novel 31, no. 3 (1999). https://www.jstor.org/stable/29533343?seq=3.
Lister, Rachel. Alice Walker - the Color Purple (a Reader’s Guide to Essential Criticism) . Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010.
Madden, William A. “Victorian Morality: Ethics Not Mysterious.” The Review of Politics 23, no. 4 (1961). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1405704.
Maison Etherique. “The Science behind Cedar Smudge: How It Works and Why It’s Effective.” Maison Etherique ~ Wellbeing Rituals, February 23, 2023. https://www.maisonetherique.com/blogs/learn/the-science-behind-cedar-smudge-how-it-works-and-why-its-effective?srsltid=AfmBOooBS7-DgV2i9SK7CmUGUKCRCA0N1-WDJO_vYO1vD5jbEJR4jSZq.
Malcová, Lucie . “Beyond What Is Written: Sexuality, Gender, and Spirituality in the Color Purple,” January 2025. https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/197123/130412876.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Mcmullen, Wayne J., and Martha Solomon. “The Politics of Adaptation: Steven Spielberg’s Appropriation Ofthe Color Purple.” Text and Performance Quarterly 14, no. 2 (April 1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939409366079.
Nils Clausson. “‘Culture and Corruption’: Paterian Self-Development versus Gothic Degeneration in Oscar Wilde’s ‘the Picture of Dorian Gray.’” Papers on Language and Literature 39.4, no. Fall 2003 (November 6, 2016). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nils-Clausson/publication/283516983_.
NPR. “‘The Color Purple’ Is about the Bonding of Women.” NPR. NPR, October 25, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/10/25/1196978233/nprs-book-of-the-day-draft-10-25-2023.
Oed.com. “Oppression - Quick Search Results | Oxford English Dictionary,” 2023. https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=oppression&tl=true.
Oscarwilde.us. “Fame,” 2025. https://www.oscarwilde.us/quotations/fame-and-obscurity.html.
Prakash, Priyadarshini. “Wilde and Aestheticism. The Uselessness of Art | Medium.” Medium, June 9, 2024. https://priyadarshiniprakash.medium.com/wilde-and-aestheticism-fd91a7ea5f80.
Rashkin, Esther. “Art as Symptom: A Portrait of Child Abuse in ‘the Picture of Dorian Gray.’” Modern Philology 95, no. 1 (1997). http://www.jstor.org/stable/438945.
Readhead, Harry. “‘The Picture of Dorian Gray’ Suggests Aestheticism Gives Way to Decay.” Medium, January 18, 2024. https://guiltandindustry.medium.com/the-picture-of-dorian-gray-by-oscar-wilde-reviewed-4d31e10aadef.
Reynolds, Peter. Novel Images. Routledge, 2013.
Seagroatt, Heather. “Hard Science, Soft Psychology, and Amorphous Art in the Picture of Dorian Gray.” Studies in English Literature, 15001900 38, no. 4 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/451096.
Sheppard, Nicholas. “Why We Need to Reconsider Oscar Wilde, on the 125th Anniversary of His Famous Trial,” July 9, 2021. https://www.fluxmagazine.com/reconsider-oscar-wilde-125th-anniversary-trial/.
Smith, Barbara, and Alice Walker. “Sexual Oppression Unmasked.” Callaloo, no. 22 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2930486.
Smith, Dinitia . “Alice Walker Criticism: ‘Celie, You a Tree’ - Dinitia Smith - ENotes.com.” ENotes, 2025. https://www.enotes.com/topics/alice-walker/criticism/walker-alice-vol-27/dinitia-smith.
The British Library. “Decadent Novel a Rebours, Or, against Nature.” Accessed February 20, 2026. https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/decadent-novel-a-rebours-or-against-nature.
Tillet, Salamishah. “Can an Abuser Make Amends? ‘the Color Purple’ Points the Way.” The New York Times, February 5, 2021, sec. Movies. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/05/movies/onscreen-abuse-hollywood-movies.html.
Tusler, Megan , Tristan Schweiger, and Katie K. “Episode 84: The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Better Read than Dead: Literature from a Left Perspective, November 14, 2021. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-84-the-picture-of-dorian-gray/id1472577259?i=1000541720881.
UK Parliament. “Regulating Sex and Sexuality: The 20th Century.” UK Parliament, 2024. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/private-lives/relationships/overview/sexuality20thcentury/.
Valandra, Brandon M. Higgins, Yvette Murphy-Erby, and Lucy M. Brown. “An Exploratory Study of African American Men’s Perspectives of Intraracial, Heterosexual Intimate Partner Violence Using a Multisystems Life Course Framework.” Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 10, no. 1 (March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1086/701824.
W, Lewis T. “MORAL MAPPING and SPIRITUAL GUIDANCE in ‘the COLOR PURPLE.’” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 73, no. 2/3 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/41178529.
Walker, Alice. “The Only Reason You Want to Go to Heaven Is That You Have Been Driven out of Your Mind by Alice Walker (1997 Reprint) | Alice Walker | the Official Website for American Novelist & Poet.” Alicewalkersgarden.com, n.d. https://alicewalkersgarden.com/1997/04/the-only-reason-you-want-to-go-to-heaven-is-that-you-have-been-driven-out-of-your-mind-by-alice-walker-1997-reprint/.
Wikipedia Contributors. “À Rebours.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, November 11, 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%80_rebours.
Wordpress.com. “Welcome to Zscaler Directory Authentication,” 2026. https://argumentativeoldgit.wordpress.com/2020/05/09/against-nature-by-joris-karl-huysmans/.
www.lboro.ac.uk. “The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde | English | Loughborough University,” n.d. https://www.lboro.ac.uk/subjects/english/undergraduate/study-guides/the-picture-of-dorian-gray/.
April, 2025
Abstract
How Did the Trauma of Dostoevsky’s Mock Execution and Siberian Labour Camp Experience Affect His Psyche, Theopolitics, and Attitude Towards the Peasant Class?
Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, The Idiot, Notes from Underground — these are all books you have probably heard of before. And if not, you have now, and there is a large rabbit hole you may enter.
Fyodor Dostoevsky is known as one of the greatest writers of all time. What even makes a 'good' writer? I don't know; everyone seems to make up their own rules anyway. However, what I can argue is that Dostoevsky is talented beyond measure in capturing that which seems to drift unconceptualised in everyday life but is vital to it. Our souls. Who are we, what are we? Dostoevsky writes to capture this — the good, the bad, the pretty and the ugly in us all. Many think of him as simply a depressed Russian who put pen to paper, but these people will soon find themselves, perhaps, arriving at a different conclusion. On the contrary, one could argue that he was quite the optimist and a loving individual, but his journey to such feelings was far from linear.
The psychological landscapes he is able to portray in his literature are extraordinary, and this essay attempts to answer how he acquired such a skill. What shaped Dostoevsky into the brilliant writer whose work is still cherished today? How could he possibly know the depths of the soul so well to portray it? In short, arrogance transcended its constraints and love triumphed over hate. Oh, and also a lot of suffering. Yet, this is only a simple generalisation, one that can only be truly understood by taking a closer look at his experiences...
June 8, 2025
How Did the Trauma of Dostoevsky’s Mock Execution and Siberian Labour Camp Experience Affect His Psyche, Theopolitics, and Attitude Toward the Peasant Class?
1.1 Introduction to Dostoevsky and His Two Profound Traumas
Fyodor Dostoevsky, born in 1821 in Moscow, was a noble-class Russian novelist who began writing in the 1840s. Widely regarded as one of the greatest writers of all time, he authored world-renowned novels such as Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov (Wikipedia, 2024). Less widely known is the profound trauma that marked his life, leaving a lasting imprint on both his psyche and worldview. Two pivotal events — his mock execution in 1849 and his subsequent imprisonment in a Siberian labour camp from 1850 to 1854 — profoundly influenced his theopolitical beliefs (defined as “relating to religion and politics”) (Wiktionary, 2022), as well as his attitude toward the peasant class. From these traumas emerged the rich psychological landscapes found in his most compelling characters.
Schlaudraff (2014) and Weil (2006) provide essential insight into Russian society during the 1840s: 90% of the population were serfs - peasants enslaved and bound to their superior’s land under an autocratic monarchy, led by Tsar Nicholas I. Reliance on forced labour and agriculture was significant, keeping peasants in poverty while the elite thrived. Frank (1990) explains how Dostoevsky’s arrest was catalysed by his involvement in the Petrashevsky Circle, a group that discussed Western philosophy, socialism, and reform. Accused of subversion, their members were sentenced to death. On 22 December 1849, Dostoevsky and others were brought to Semonovsky Square before a “firing squad” and their open graves (Weil, 2006, Lecture 11, 8:23). However, seconds before execution, their sentences were commuted to forced labour under the brutal Katorga system — a penal labour system created as a form of punishment and abolished in the 1860s (Gentes, 2002). This near-death experience left a deep psychological imprint, and over the next four years in Omsk prison, Dostoevsky lived among peasant convicts undergoing a profound internal transformation (Frank, 1990). By drawing on modern psychological theories and accounts of the time, we can analyse the mental processes and subsequent evolution of both his theopolitical doctrine and outlook on the peasant class.
1.2 Theopolitics, Attitude Toward the Peasantry and Trauma
Before imprisonment, Dostoevsky adhered to a form of utopian socialism deeply intertwined with Christian belief (Dostoevsky and Ginsburg, 1974). Influenced by the Russian Orthodox faith of his childhood and those of the Petrashevsky circle (Schlaudraff, 2014), he envisioned an idealised society where people would cooperate rather than compete (Weil, Lecture 11). Overall, this is evidence of an idealist socialism interwoven with Christian belief — a theopolitical doctrine which would be profoundly challenged and transformed in Siberia.
Dostoevsky’s attitude toward the peasant class was similarly shaped by romanticised ideals. Through visits to his father’s estate, he came into early contact with serfs, whom he regarded with benevolence — albeit perhaps a condescending kind. As Schlaudraff (2014, p. 24) explains, he viewed them in a “purely romantic light [...] advocating for their advancement on a purely academic level”, seeing them as noble and moral in a manner consistent with French and Russian idealist thought. Expecting to find suffering yet virtuous souls among the convicts, he was disillusioned by the harsh realities of prison life and his idealism was shattered (Frank, 1990). Nevertheless, by the end of his sentence, being forced to “live cheek-by-jowl with the peasant convicts”, he had regained his admiration for the peasantry — not through abstract idealism, but through a deeper and grounded appreciation (Frank, 1990, p. 88).
With context established, it is important to now define trauma to assess the impact of Dostoevsky’s experiences effectively. Trauma refers to an overwhelming event, either sudden or prolonged, and is typically categorised as acute (one-time), complex (series of events), chronic (long-term), or secondary (of indirect exposure) (JED foundation, no date; Missouri's Early Care & Education Connections, 2022). Thus, Dostoevsky’s mock execution qualifies as an acute trauma, while his imprisonment represents a chronic trauma.
1.3 The Years of Ordeal and Notes from the House of the Dead
Joseph Frank’s The Years of Ordeal, the second volume of his five-part biography on Dostoevsky, serves as a foundational source within this essay. Published in 1990, it is regarded as one of the most comprehensive studies on the author, drawing on a wealth of both primary and secondary materials including: personal letters, memoirs, historical records, and Dostoevsky’s own fiction. Frank, a leading scholar in Russian literature, holds a Ph.D in comparative literature and has spent nearly two decades teaching at Princeton, rendering this source highly reliable. A central component of his account is Notes from the House of the Dead, Dostoevsky’s semi-fictionalized prison memoir. Due to censorship under the Tsarist regime, Dostoevsky was forced to alter and fictionalise his experiences (Frank, 1990; Kroeker and Ward, 2014). Although this raises questions about its reliability, the memoir, nonetheless, remains valuable due to its autobiographical content, corroborated by external accounts (Frank, 1990). Overall, despite its limitations, Notes from the House of the Dead remains essential for understanding Dostoevsky’s psychological transformation. Thus, this essay will reference it through Frank’s authoritative framework, alongside other scholarly sources.
2. Mock Execution: An Overview
Dostoevsky’s mock execution — an acute trauma — had a significant impact on his psyche, submerging him into a spiritual and existential reflection which set the stage for his following chronic trauma. Using modern psychological science in conjunction with an illuminating letter Dostoevsky had written to his brother, it is possible to scrutinize the psychological effects and subsequent mental shifts that had occurred.
During Dostoevsky’s mock execution, open graves had been dug, military personnel were assembled, and a priest read aloud the convicts’ sentence, pressing the Christian cross to each of their lips (Frank, 1990). The soldiers aimed their rifles at the men and prepared to fire. However, moments before firing, the convicts’ sentences were suddenly commuted to penal labour in Siberia. Carefully orchestrated, the Tsar endeavoured to inflict maximum impact on the victims, and as Frank (1990, p. 52) puts it, “terror” was being used as a “revolutionary weapon”. Clearly, it was a kind of psychological experiment meant to humble political prisoners.
2.1 A Transcendental Experience
Faced with imminent death, Dostoevsky underwent a deeply transcendental episode, marked by a surreal detachment from reality — a classic symptom of depersonalisation. Insights from professional counsellor Josephine Creighton (2024), who holds degrees in social psychology and counselling, offer a helpful framework for understanding the impacts of near-death experience (NDE), which can be applied to Dostoevsky. NDEs or near-death experiences are defined as “profound transcendental events experienced on the threshold of death” (Greyson, 1983). Navarro (2020) expands on this, explaining that NDEs can occur either when a person is close to death or when they are clinically dead and later revived. In Dostoevsky’s case, it was the former. Creighton (2024) explains that such experiences often provoke profound spiritual or existential revelations, which can be seen in Dostoevsky’s transformation. Using the semi-autobiographical novel “The Idiot”, which Dostoevsky wrote years later, it is possible to scrutinize Dostoevsky’s spiritual experience. The main character, Prince Myshkin, recalls a man sentenced to death and unexpectedly pardoned — an event mirroring Dostoevsky’s own. The man fixates on golden rays of light from a church cupola, believing it represented the very divine nature he would soon embody — a highly transcendental and mystical thought. This vivid, metaphysical imagery convincingly suggests a psychological process of depersonalisation: a defence against the threat of death, whereby an individual excludes and replaces unpleasant realities with a pleasurable and peaceful fantasy, protecting them from emotionally paralysing trauma (Greyson, 1990). In this way, Dostoevsky’s suggested hyperfixation on the golden light, acting as a utopian escape, can be convincingly inferred to serve as such a coping mechanism. Encounters with bright light and or beings of light are commonly associated with the NDE (Navarro, 2020; Greyson, 2008), further validating the experience. Furthermore, the presence of the nearby Church of St. Sergius of Radonezh supports the event's plausibility. Fascinatingly, Greyson (2008) also notes that paradoxical feelings may surface during an NDE. This is highly accurate in Dostoevsky’s case, since he felt both a “mystic terror” (Miller and Strakhov, 1883, p. 119, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 55) and was “quite excited” (Lvov, 1956, no. 63, p. 188, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 58). As an eyewitness and compatriot of Dostoevsky, Miller's account is highly reliable. Overall, Dostoevsky’s NDE likely offered psychological protection through depersonalisation while catalysing a profound spiritual episode.
2.2 New Convictions and a Renewed Life Narrative
As well as Dostoevsky’s experience during his NDE, his secondarily formed convictions are just as significant to understanding the psychological effect of the event. The result of his mock execution was an array of new convictions such as an increased sense of happiness, love, inner strength, moral purification, and a better understanding of the purpose of one's life (Frank, 1990). In an overarching sense, Dostoevsky can be explained to have experienced Post-traumatic growth, which is the experience of “finding benefit or value in a trauma experience” (Kaminer and Eagle, 2010, p. 77). This definition is further reinforced by Khanna and Greyson (2015), who explain post-traumatic growth as the event of positive psychological change after an extreme trauma. In this way, traumatic experiences can be used as a vehicle for positive change. Dostoevsky’s newly formed convictions are clearly demonstrated via a significant and retrospective letter he had written to his brother, Mikhail, immediately after his brush with death (Frank, 1990). This letter is highly valuable for numerous reasons. Firstly, the provenance — coming directly from the victim — adds immense significance. Moreover, the fact that it had been written minutes after the event renders the content highly credible. Finally, since it is a private correspondence, the contents likely capture Dostoevsky’s uncensored feelings, making the content incredibly valuable in the pursuit of comprehending the genuine psychological/spiritual consequences of the incident. Individuals who have experienced trauma often adopt a victim complex, leading them to think, “Why did this happen to me?” whereas others may feel as though they have been protected and are extremely lucky (Kaminer and Eagle, 2010; Creighton, 2024). The latter is evident in how Dostoevsky recounted to his wife years later, “I cannot recall when I was ever as happy as on that day […] I […] sang at the top of my voice, so happy was I at being given back my life.” (Frank, 1990, p. 76). Furthermore, alongside experiencing happiness, Dostoevsky’s psyche was profoundly transformed by the variety of meaningful revelations he gained from his NDE. Kaminer and Eagle (2010) explain how there are three meaningful outcomes which come out of NDEs: positive changes in the perception of self, improvement in relationships with others, and a changed philosophy of life — all of which are apparent in Dostoevsky.
For example, he perceived a newfound spiritual strength, or as Frank (1990, p. 62) puts it, an “armour of spiritual invulnerability” in himself. This is evident in his insistence to his brother: “never before have I felt welling up in me such abundant and healthy reserves of spiritual life” (Dostoevsky, 1929-1859, I:130-131, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 60). Furthermore, he continues, “I am not afraid that any kind of material hardship will destroy me”. Thus, it is clear that Dostoevsky adopted a certain spiritual strength and confidence as a result of his NDE, resonating with Kaminer and Eagle’s proposed “positive change in the perception of self”. Secondly, Dostoevsky experienced a growing connection to his brother, stating “and only then did I know how much I love you my dear brother”. Carter (2010) confirms that the ability to give and receive love is a central message linked to those who have experienced a NDE. Finally, the “changed philosophy of life”, where one gains a greater appreciation of life, finding a richer meaning/purpose to life, is also evident in Dostoevsky. This is demonstrated in how he reflects on his life: how much time “I [...] wasted on nothing [...] futilities, errors, laziness, incapacity to live, how I did not value time, how little I appreciated it [...] Life is a gift, life is happiness, every minute can be an eternity of happiness […] if youth only knew! In changing my life I am now reborn in a new form […] brother I swear […] I will be reborn for the better” (Dostoevsky, 1929-1859, I:130-131, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 62). This emphasises how Dostoevsky had gained a greater appreciation of life — a common consequence of NDE (Greyson, 1983, cited in Khanna and Greyson, 2013; Schaeppi, 2018).
Additionally, a deeper understanding of life's meaning and purpose is another common psychological result of the NDE (Navarro, 2020; Greyson, 1990; Greyson, 2008; Khanna and Greyson, 2013). This applies to Dostoevsky as he came to find what he thought was the true purpose of life, as “not to lose heart and not to give in no matter what misfortune may occur — that is what life is, that is its task, I have become aware of this. This idea has entered into my flesh and blood” (Dostoevsky, 1929-1859, I:129, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 63). Thus, he believed that life came from within and that happiness did too, that no misfortune could break a human, and that the upholding of this human integrity was life’s purpose. Moreover, he believed that no misfortune could outweigh the immense happiness subsequent to our ability to be alive. Significantly impacted by the wave of renewal from his trauma, he became committed to communicating to others the same conviction of infinite possibility that he had experienced (Frank, 1990). Coming to realize the true purpose of life, Dostoevsky can convincingly be argued — both by various source authors (Frank, 1990; Navarro, 2020; Greyson, 1990; Khanna and Greyson, 2013) and through inference — to have felt a greater connection to the universe, while his desire to dedicate his life to communicating his findings supports the idea of an increased connection with other people.
Finally, an increased compassion and love for others/universal love is also a common trait of the NDE (Khanna and Greyson, 2013; Carter, 2010; Greyson, 2006). This is evident in Dostoevsky as he gains a greater desire for forgiveness, displaying a certain moral purification. For example, Dostoevsky relayed, “If anyone remembers me nasty or if I quarrelled with anybody… ask them to forget” (Dostoevsky, 1829–1859, I:130, cited in Frank, 1990). He felt a need to forgive and to be forgiven, a desire to embrace others in unconditional love. He also endeavoured to communicate the saving power of Christ as “Expiation, forgiveness and love” took over his life, alluding to the absolute christian amendment of mutual, all-forgiving and all-embracing love (Frank, 1990, p. 63). In this way, it is clear that this experience also had a major effect on his religious faith as well as having broader positive psychological effects.
3. Siberian Labour Camp, Omsk Prison: An Overview
Exiled to Omsk prison and forced into manual labour, Dostoevsky endured chronic trauma that truly transformed his psyche, theopolitical doctrine, and view of the peasant class. To analyse this transformation, two key primary sources, his Siberian letters and The House of the Dead, will be utilised alongside wider psychological science. Initially, the peasantry’s immediate and relentless hostility toward Dostoevsky deeply shocked and disturbed him (Schlaudraff, 2014). He had previously believed that true cruelty stemmed from the elite, and yet in prison, he found all to be “defiled and degraded” (Dostoevsky, 1862, 4:10, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 96). Shankman (2013) and Frank (1990) explain how he adopted a deep sense of resentment towards the peasant class, which simultaneously ate away at himself, challenging his former humanitarianism. However, by the end of his sentence, he no longer viewed the peasantry with disdain or as abstract cogs in a socialist system, but as morally complex individuals whom he deeply admired (Frank, 1990). It can be reasoned that he came to see the peasantry as the spiritual heart of Russia, redeemed not through political reform but through faith, suffering, and divine submission. While prison conditions and his epilepsy can be logically seen to have laid the groundwork for psychological change, two experiences were central in catalysing his renewed love and transformed perspective.
3.1 First Impressions and an Emerging Contempt
The first year of Dostoevsky’s four-year sentence can be deemed the worst, as he was exposed to the brutal nature of the peasant convicts and to a society which alienated him, sending him into a depressive state. A Polish nobleman warned him: “they are ill disposed to you because you were once a gentleman [...] you will meet with a lot of unpleasantness here” (Dostoevsky, 1862, 4:32, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 98). Dostoevsky came to learn that “he [ a nobleman] is not a friend, and not a comrade” and will “forever be painfully conscious that he is solitary and remote from all” (Dostoevsky, 1862, 4:198, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 99). This social alienation, paired with horrific prison conditions, led to his withdrawal from society and resentment for the peasant class (Shankman, 2013; Jackson, 1995; Kroeker and Ward, 2014; Frank, 1990) - this took a severe psychological toll.
3.2 The Psychological Toll of Prison: Alienation, Austerity and Abuse
Dostoevsky, already known for his sensitivity and difficulty handling opposition, likely experienced prison subjugation more intensely than others (Frank, 1990). He described the “misery of that first year” as “intolerable” and its “bitter effects” as “poisoning” his whole life (Dostoevsky, 1862, 4:176, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 105). Psychologically, he likely felt worthlessness, despair, and apathy, common emotional states for prisoners, which contribute to a phenomenon known as prison rot, where emotional and cognitive function deteriorates (Taylor, 1960). This is evident in how he became withdrawn, embraced self-hatred, and expressed hostility towards others. (The fruition of hostility and introversion in long-term prisoners is corroborated (A et al., 1973).) Frank (1990) explains how Dostoevsky despised the peasant convicts, marking a stark shift in his humanitarian outlook, and adopted a masochistic self-hatred, “craving to tear open one's wound on purpose, as though the consciousness of one's misery was an actual enjoyment” (Dostoevsky, 1862, 4:56, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 100). Fascinatingly, Erving Goffman’s theory of total institutions aligns with prisonization, emphasising how isolated institutions, like prisons, reshape identities and behaviors by imposing new norms and expectations (Placer, 2009). Dostoevsky, submerged in hatred and hostility, became a product of this very environment. He later admitted, “there were moments when I hated everybody […] innocent or guilty [...] the most unbearable misfortune is when you yourself become unjust, malignant, vile” (Dostoevsky, 1854, I:143, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 105); an observer described him as “wasted”, speaking only in “fragmentary and brief replies”. Additionally, Quandt and Jones (2021) highlight loneliness as a key factor in prisoners’ poor mental health. Alongside daily persecution from the peasantry, Dostoevsky’s isolation is poignantly captured in his remark: “there was only one creature in the world who was my friend — my faithful dog Sharik” (Dostoevsky, 1862, 4:77, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 101).
Regarding the prison’s physical conditions, Dostoevsky describes being “packed like herrings in a barrel”, sleeping only on wooden “bare boards”, and enduring “intolerable closeness” (Dostoevsky, 1928-1959, pp. 135-37, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 76). This undoubtedly had a severe impact on his psyche since overcrowding, as explained by Quant and Jones (2021), intensifies mental challenges, contributing to both depression and hostility. Moreover, Dostoevsky himself wrote, “In this enforced communism one turns into a hater of mankind […] the society of other people becomes an unbearable torture” (Dostoevsky, 1854, I:143, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 152).
Finally, Major Krivstov’s relentless tyranny can be inferred to have compounded Dostoevsky’s psychological distress. The Major would routinely inflict severe punishments for minor infractions, such as sleeping on the wrong side, including up to 200 lashes (Gentes, 2002). An “eternal threat of punishment” plagued Dostoevsky (Dostoevsky, 1928-1959, pp. 135-37, cited in Frank 1990, p. 77). This abuse would have indefinitely heightened his psychological stress, contributing to a growing hostility. Ultimately, the brutal conditions of prison cultivated a severe mental dissent in the author, leading to his view of the peasant class to become highly negative, sharply contrasting the humanitarian idealism he had held before prison.
3.3 Opposed to the Tsar to a Russian Patriot: An Inner Crisis, a Divided Self
Though initially opposed to the Tsar, Dostoevsky’s time in the labor camp triggered an unexpected ideological shift, awakening a deep sense of Russian patriotism. This newfound nationalism conflicted with his growing disdain for the peasant convicts, creating a psychological crisis best understood through the psychological theory of the “divided self” — coined by William James (James, 2009, p. 127, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 118). Initially, Dostoevsky aligned himself with Polish noblemen, who openly scorned the peasants. However, as a result of political arguments, exacerbated by the Crimean War of 1853, he began to embody a significant patriotism and nationalist sentiment (Frank, 1990). It can be convincingly argued that this shift was a result of Donald Clemmer’s theory of prisonization, where prisoners adapt to the norms of prison life (Placer, 2009, p. 13). For example, if we apply this theory to the smaller control group of the Polish, it can be argued that due to being exposed to their severe nationalism, it ignited Dostoevsky’s own nationalism. In this way, his political identity was likely reshaped, becoming a sort of Russian patriot, despite being initially opposed to the Tsar regime. As a result, Dostoevsky found himself caught in a profound inner crisis as he was torn between his newfound patriotism and an extreme disdain for the peasant class, which had been compounding (Frank, 1990). William James states that the act of conversion can occur in any area of life and not only in typical forms, such as in religious contexts (James, 2009). This can be seen in how Dostoevsky eventually experienced a conversion in his feelings towards the peasant class as well as in his theopolitical stance. However, it is ascertained that this process does occur when one is tormented by a severe inner conflict and has become what James calls “a divided self” (Frank, 1990, p. 188). Significantly, James also explains that if the person affected is more sensitive or spiritually aware, their inner turmoil will likely manifest in the form of moral guilt and shame, “of feeling inwardly vile and wrong […] of standing in false relations to the author of one's being and appointer of one's spiritual fate.” (James, 2009, p. 130). This resonates highly in Dostoevsky’s case, as he began to feel guilt and shame upon reflecting on his hatred towards his own people (Frank, 1990). His spiritual and religious conclusion from his mock execution, being that of embracing all in unconditional love and thus communicating the saving power of Christ, was evidently in conflict with his current, hateful state. Dostoevsky was painfully aware of this fact and how his contempt toward the peasantry (Frank, 1990) betrayed the compassion he had rediscovered. This deep turmoil likely laid the foundations for a deeper psychological transformation.
3.4 The Perfect Environment for Change:
The combination of the harsh prison conditions and Dostoevsky’s snowballing guilt cultivated the perfect environment — and a malleable psyche — for his convictions toward the peasantry to undergo a complex conversion, regenerating the humanitarian outlook he once held. Ultimately, it was within this fragile mental state that two key events were able to catalyse the regeneration of his convictions towards the peasantry, as well as contributing to a shift in his broader theopolitical beliefs. These events are, firstly, a vision of a peasant named “Marey” and a theatrical experience in prison. Dr. William Sargant explains that when an individual reaches nervous exhaustion due to stress or psychological strain, it can lead to “transmarginal inhibition” (Frank, 1990, p. 118) — a wiping out of old behavioural patterns, making the individual highly susceptible to new ideas and beliefs. In extreme cases, Pavlov refers to this as the “ultraparadoxical phase”, where past convictions are entirely reversed and replaced (Sargant, 1971, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 118). In Dostoevsky's case, the extreme physical and mental stress from alienation, cramped living conditions, inner conflict and abuse logically disrupted his nervous system, triggering this state and increasing his receptivity to new beliefs. However, whether or not he reached the “ultraparadoxical phase” remains open to interpretation. While he did experience a profound shift in his attitude toward the peasantry, it may reflect a reawakening of earlier humanitarian beliefs, now deepened and transformed, rather than a full conversion. Where he once saw the peasants as mere cogs in a socialist ideal, he came to view them as the spiritual core of Russia: complex, dignified, and worthy of respect. Additionally, Dostoevsky’s epileptic seizures (beginning in 1850) likely compounded his psychological exhaustion — clinically termed as the “overloading of the brain with stimuli to the point of convulsion,” — creating exactly the state of “transmarginal inhibition” that breaks down old mental patterns and allows for the formation of new ones (Frank, 1990, p. 119). Ultimately, the mental toll of prison life and seizures placed Dostoevsky in an extremely malleable state, enabling two significant events to effectively reshape his beliefs and values.
3.5 Peasant Marey and Theatre: A Complex Regeneration of Positive Convictions
As mentioned, two key events reshaped Dostoevsky’s views: a vision during Easter and a theatrical experience at Christmas, both significant Christian holidays. The Peasant Marey vision was particularly transformative, as it marked the first time Dostoevsky truly and emotionally identified with the peasantry (Frank, 1990), rekindling his earlier loving attitudes. Still torn between hatred and moral obligation (a clear manifestation of his “divided self”), Dostoevsky found solace in Easter rituals/lenten service, which provided breaks from labour and evoked memories of his untroubled childhood faith. During mass, the sight of convicts bowing in chains struck him and revealed their profound faith and devotion (Shankman, 2013; Frank, 1990). Yet, due to Dostoevsky’s “divided self”, resentment and contempt often resurfaced (Frank, 1990). However, a Polish convict’s comment, “I hate these bandits![peasants]”, (Dostoevsky, 1876, p. 206, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 122; Shankman, 2013, para 5) catalysed a transformative shift in the author. This remark led him to recognize how strong his identification with the Polish had become and how far he had strayed from that of his fellow Russians. Lying on his plank-bed, his conflicted sentiments lingered before giving way to a transformative vision: The Marey Vision (Frank, 1990, Shankman, 2013).
Frank (1990, p. 122) explains that at a peak in his inner struggle, Dostoevsky turned inward, using a “technique of involuntary association” to release repressed memories and relive his psychic blockages. Frank (1990) and Bagby (2016) further clarify that Dostoevsky’s inward reflections would begin with small memories that grew into vivid images and ultimately served as a form of self-psychoanalysis. This introspection, common among convicts seeking “refuge” in their interior lives (Hardt, 1997, p. 66), clearly mirrors the theory of depersonalisation mentioned earlier, as Dostoevsky distanced himself from his painful reality and instead sought to create idealized versions of memories, “taking refuge from bitter reality” (Leningrad, 1972-1990, 28:1:171, cited in Jackson, 1995, p. 4). Years later, Dostoevsky stated: “Truth dawns in adversity” (Leningrad, 1972-1990, 28:1:177, cited in Jackson, 1995, p. 4) and Jackson (1995, p. 4) adds that this “truth for Dostoevsky was indubitably Christian truth.” Jackson’s argument is a convincing one, since Dostoevsky’s vision resulted in a highly Christian epiphany. For example, during his vision, a memory of his childhood encounter with a peasant named Marey resurfaced. Frightened by a possible wolf sighting, he had ran to a peasant working in the fields of his father’s estate. Marey had immediately soothed him, smiling gently and assuring him that there was no wolf, before blessing him with the Christian cross, and sending him back home (Ferry, 2023; Shankman, 2013; Frank, 1990). This memory, lost for 20 years and now vividly recalled, deeply moved Dostoevsky as he recognised in Marey’s unselfish compassion a profound Christian love, free from ulterior motives and made even more significant given their social differences and the absence of any reward or recognition (Ferry, 2023).
The pure Christian love Dostoevsky had witnessed through his vision, led to a shift in his perspective, best understood via the psychological process of “transmarginal inhibition” — where old patterns of brain behaviour and response are wiped from the brain and new beliefs/convictions form. When applied to Dostoevsky, it is clear that his hostile and negative outlook on the peasantry was wiped and replaced with a renewed loving and compassionate attitude. “I suddenly […] could look at these unfortunates with quite different eyes […] all hatred and rancor had vanished from my heart […] that despised peasant […] why he might also be that very same Marey; I cannot peer into his heart after all” (Dostoevsky, 1876, p. 210, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 123; Shankman, 2013, para 6). Fascinatingly, this experience mirrors Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics of the “other”, which stresses that individuals must not be reduced to societal categories, as each person has a unique, unknowable subjectivity (Shankman, 2013). Moreover, Leavinas argues that we must respect this unknowable aspect, avoiding stereotypes that limit the infinite possibilities of what others might be (Shankman, 2013). Comparatively, when applied to Dostoevsky, it is clear that his encounter with Marey reflects this idea, as he realizes that the compassion found in Marey may be within the very convicts he had grown to despise; he cannot fully understand the “other [convicts]”, leaving them infinite. Ultimately, this vision clearly reawakened and regenerated Dostoevsky’s humanitarian outlook, but redesigned it with a new sense of genuine compassion and humility.
3.6 Theatre: A Deepening of Sentiments
While the peasant Marey vision reignited Dostoevsky’s Christian compassion for the peasantry, it was the shared experience of theatre that can be seen to truly open his eyes to the convict’s deeply positive features, deepening his renewed conviction into genuine respect and admiration. During Christmas, a military ward was transformed into a theatre, where convicts could perform for fellow inmates and external spectators, momentarily dissolving social divisions (Jackson, 1995). Jackson (1995, p. 9) explains how the event allowed convicts to shed their outcast status and reclaim dignity through symbolic communion, becoming “new identities” and “full humans”. This resonates with Goffman’s theory (cited in Hardt, 1997) that convicts seek refuge from their realities via dreams of freedom. Fascinatingly, given Quant and Jones’s (2021) findings on prison loneliness and its mental toll, the performance potentially offered Dostoevsky a rare reprieve, perhaps even reversing his psychological stress and reinforcing his emerging loving attitudes. He began to see moral depth in many of his fellow convicts (Frank, 1990). Notably, since Dostoevsky declared many of the convicts good (Frank, 1990), there is an argument that he may have blurred moral boundaries, admiring criminals indiscriminately — this is reasonable since, due to the mental stress of prison and epilepsy, his brain functions most probably were not operating at a rational baseline. However, Frank (1990) debunks this misconception, noting that Dostoevsky consistently condemned crime. He wrote “there are crimes…that will be considered so as long as man remains human,” and even considered some irredeemably evil, “of another species” altogether (Dostoevsky, 1876, 4: 15, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 137). Thus, while he grew to admire many convicts, he never confused humanity with inhumanity. This clarification makes it evident that his reflections on the convicts’ goodness were rooted not in moral confusion but in genuine insight. He described the convicts with a “strange light of pure, childlike joy […] shining on those lined and branded brows […] usually so gloomy” (Dostoevsky, 1876, 4: 122-123, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 134). Jackson (1995) and Frank (1990) also stress how he had identified the theatre with the church as well as his own childhood — times of harmony and bliss, which he saw on the faces of all.
Unlike the rest of the penal camp, where Dostoevsky’s noble status made him a target of ridicule, the prison theatre inverted these social dynamics. Here, he was shown unexpected respect and a front-row seat (Jackson, 1995; Frank, 1990). Although others claimed this was purely a transactional gesture, Dostoevsky believed it reflected moral sensibility and justice: the convicts deferred to his greater familiarity with Western plays: “They looked upon me as to some extent a theater-goer [...] on this occasion I had the honor of a front place.” (Dostoevsky, 1876, 4: I2I-122, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 134). Fascinatingly, in Notes from the House of the Dead, he casts himself as a mere observer, but Jackson (1995) clarifies that he actually directed the productions (highlighting the text's blend of fact and fiction). Since this role would not have been censored, his downplaying may reflect a form of humility. Nevertheless, Dostoevsky perceived the convicts, even those who disliked him, as adhering to an unspoken ethic: they did not assert power outside their domain, embodying a justice rooted in mutual respect. Ultimately, building on his Marey vision, the theatre experience deepened Dostoevsky’s view of the lower class — not as resigned victims but as moral exemplars. “There is not much our wise men [upper class] could teach them. On the contrary, I think it is the wise men who ought to learn from the people” (Dostoevsky, 1876, 4: 121-122, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 135). Through this, Dostoevsky abandoned the idea that intellectual elites must redeem the masses through a socialist ideal, coming instead to see divine truth among society’s humblest members, in their moral and ethical wisdom. Psychologically and in an overarching manner, the theatre experience suggests a certain continuation of transmarginal inhibition, as his new and emerging convictions began to solidify, overturning negative pastimes.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, the deep psychological impact of Dostoevsky’s mock execution and imprisonment reshaped both his theopolitical beliefs and his view of the peasantry. While it is tempting to scrutinise which trauma affected him more, it was their interwoven relationship that truly cultivated his transformation. The mock execution sparked intense post-traumatic growth, filling him with a transcendent, purifying love, an awakening he embraced that was later shattered and replaced with hatred via the brutal reality of imprisonment (Frank, 1990). This stark contrast, from one emotional extreme to another, explains the depth of his psychological collapse; his guilt over hating the peasantry became unbearable precisely because it clashed with the intense love he had previously embodied, ultimately opening the path to a renewed, more grounded humanitarianism, stripped of earlier condescension and idealism. This complex regeneration is clearly a result of a form of “transmarginal inhibition” — a release of old behaviours/beliefs and the formation of new ones due to intense psychological stress (Frank, 1990).
Dostoevsky’s evolving theopolitical views were shaped by his transition from utopian socialism, which saw the peasantry as needing redemption by the elite, to a return to a deepened Christian worldview that revered the peasants for their moral justice and love. The immensely stressful environment of the labor camp, coupled with his psychological vulnerability, clearly played a crucial role in this change. Ultimately, his experiences led him to see the peasantry not as passive objects of reform, but as moral teachers, a view shared by Shankman (2013) and Frank (1990), as a class from whom the elite should learn, not lead; “the wise men…ought to learn from the people” (Dostoevsky, 1876, 4: 121-122, cited in Frank, 1990, p. 135).
Beyond reshaping his own worldview, Dostoevsky’s traumatic experiences also profoundly influenced thinkers like Kafka, Nietzsche, and Freud (who used his experience as a foundation when teaching psychoanalysis) (TV Brics, 2021), highlighting the depth and reach of Dostoevsky’s transformation. His exposure to both depravity and spiritual resilience among convicts lent his literary characters extraordinary psychological depth (Frank, 1990), allowing us to witness the raw and authentic truths of the human soul. Dostoevsky often chose to centre seemingly degraded peasants in his works to prove that love and strength could emerge even from the most unlikely places — a clear reflection of his own profound journey from hatred and contempt to a complex rediscovery of all-embracing love. All in all, perhaps the evolution of Dostoevsky’s views stands as a profound testament to humility and the transformative power of love born from suffering.
Reference List
A, B.P., V, S.F., J, H.K. and Bolton, N. (1973). PSYCHOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF LONG TERM IMPRISONMENT. The British Journal of Criminology, [online] 13(4), pp.312–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/23636837.
Bagby, L. (2016). Dostoevsky’s Initial PostSiberian Work. In: First Words. [online] Academic Studies Press, pp.28–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zxsjft.7.
Carter, C. (2010). Science and the Near-Death Experience. [online] Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.co.jp/books?hl=en&lr=&id=110oDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT18&dq=metaphysical+effects+of+near+death&ots=rIzeDLcNsd&sig=PPjNPnNTtyO193SadT3Z_AJULCE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false [Accessed 23 Dec. 2024].
Creighton, J. (2024). Psychology interview. 15 Dec.
Ferry, J. (2023). View of Individualism and the Metaphysics of Freedom; Or, Deconstructing Dostoevsky. [online] Univr.it. Available at: https://dostoevsky-studies.dlls.univr.it/article/view/1334/1267 [Accessed 27 Jan. 2025].
Frank, J. (1990). The years of ordeal : 1850-1859. [online] Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press. Available at: https://www.christianbook.com/dostoevsky-the-years-ordeal-1850-1859/joseph-frank/9780691014227/pd/14221 [Accessed 10 Oct. 2024].
Gentes , A. (2002). Katorga: Penal Labour and Tsarist Siberia. [online] Available at: https://miskinhill.com.au/journals/asees/18:1-2/katorga.pdf [Accessed 24 Jan. 2025].
Greyson, B. (1983). The Psychodynamics of Near-Death Experiences. [online] Available at: https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/wp-content/uploads/sites/360/2017/01/NDE9.pdf [Accessed 17 Dec. 2024].
Greyson, B. (2006). Near Death Experiences and Spirituality. Zygon, [online] 41(2), pp.393–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00745.x.
Greyson, B. (2008). The Mystical Impact of Near-Death Experiences. [online] Available at: https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/wp-content/uploads/sites/360/2017/01/NDE51_mystical-Shift.pdf [Accessed 23 Dec. 2024].
Hardt, M. (1997). Prison Time. Yale French Studies, [online] (91), pp.64–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2930374.
Jackson, R.L. (1995). Dostoevsky and Freedom. New Zealand Slavonic Journal, [online] pp.1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/23806837.
James, W. (2009). The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature Página 1 de 400 The Varieties of Religious Experience : a Study in Human Nature / William James. [online] Available at: https://csrs.nd.edu/assets/59930/williams_1902.pdf [Accessed 28 Feb. 2025].
Kaminer , D. and Eagle, G. (2010). Chapter 4 TRAUMA AS A CRISIS OF MEANING. [online] JSTOR. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.18772/22010105096.7 [Accessed 16 Nov. 2024].
Khanna, S. and Greyson, B. (2013). Near-Death Experiences and Spiritual Well-Being. Journal of Religion and Health, [online] 53(6), pp.1605–1615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9723-0.
Khanna, S. and Greyson, B. (2015). Near-Death Experiences and Posttraumatic Growth. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, [online] 203(10), pp.749–755. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000362.
Kroeker, P.T. and Ward, B.K. (2014). Gulag Ethics: Russian and Mennonite Prison Memoirs from Siberia. [online] University of Winnipeg, pp.251–268. Available at: file:///Users/robinreilly/Downloads/tallen,+Journal+manager,+s_251_268.pdf [Accessed 27 Jan. 2025].
Missouri's Early Care & Education Connections (2022). Trauma-Informed Care | Early Connections. [online] earlyconnections.mo.gov. Available at: https://earlyconnections.mo.gov/professionals/trauma-informed-care [Accessed 15 Dec. 2024].
Navarro, D. (2020). The Near-Death Experience as a Spiritual Awakening. [online] Thrive Global. Available at: https://community.thriveglobal.com/the-near-death-experience-as-a-spiritual-awakening/ [Accessed 23 Dec. 2024].
Placer, M. (2009). SPIRITUAL TRANSFORMATION IN PRISON. [online] Wake Forest University, pp.1–65. Available at: https://wakespace.lib.wfu.edu/bitstream/handle/10339/14693/Placer_Thesis.pdf [Accessed 24 Jan. 2025].
Professor Irwin Weil, Ph.D. (2006). The Great Courses: Classics of Russian Literature. [online] Thegreatcourses.com. Available at: https://www.thegreatcourses.com/player/Video/2830?autoplay=false [Accessed 26 Sep. 2024].
Quandt, K.R. and Jones, A. (2021). Research roundup: Incarceration can cause lasting damage to mental health. [online] Prison Policy Initiative. Available at: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2021/05/13/mentalhealthimpacts/ [Accessed 21 Jan. 2025].
Schaeppi, A.L. (2018). The Psychology of Life after a Near Death Experience. [online] reallifepsych. Available at: https://www.reallifepsych.com/single-post/2018/07/09/The-Psychology-of-Life-after-a-Near-Death-Experience [Accessed 23 Dec. 2024].
Schlaudraff , P. (2014). Dostoevsky’s View of the Russian Soul and Its Impact on the Russian Question in the Brothers Karamazov. [online] Texas Digital Library . Available at: https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/11c0ac1b-b005-440b-8c30-d875901d2c25/content [Accessed 28 Nov. 2024].
Shankman, S. (2013). Narrative, Rupture, Transformation: Dostoevsky in Prison and on the Road. Comparative Critical Studies, [online] 10(supplement), pp.27–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2013.0111.
Taylor, A.J.W. (1960). EFFECTS OF IMPRISONMENT. The British Journal of Criminology, [online] 1(1), pp.64–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/23635834.
The Jed Foundation. (n.d.). Understanding Emotional Trauma | JED. [online] Available at: https://jedfoundation.org/resource/understanding-emotional-trauma/ [Accessed 15 Dec. 2024].
TV BRICS (2021). ‘Dostoevsky Intercontinental’. A documentary by the joint editorial team of TV BRICS. [online] Vimeo. Available at: https://vimeo.com/649421297 [Accessed 29 Jan. 2025].
Wikipedia Contributors (2024). List of letters from Fyodor Dostoevsky. [online] Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_letters_from_Fyodor_Dostoevsky [Accessed Feb. 2025].
Wiktionary. (2022). theopolitical - Wiktionary, the free dictionary. [online] Available at: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/theopolitical [Accessed 11 Mar. 2025].
Bibliography
American Psychological Association (2021). Trauma. American Psychological Association. [online] Available at: https://www.apa.org/topics/trauma [Accessed 15 Dec. 2024].
Brooks, J. (2019). Prince Myshkin (The Idiot): the falling sickness, The Gambler, and ‘The Grand Inquisitor’. British Journal of General Practice, [online] 69(689), pp.618–618. doi:https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19x706985.
Bush, N.E. and Greyson, B. (2014). Distressing Near-Death Experiences: The Basics. Missouri Medicine, [online] 111(6), pp.486–491. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6173534/ [Accessed 22 Dec. 2024].
Clark, L., Lawrence, A.J., Astley-Jones, F. and Gray, N. (2009). Gambling Near-Misses Enhance Motivation to Gamble and Recruit Win-Related Brain Circuitry. Neuron, 61(3), pp.481–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.031.
Dana’s library (2023). English story. Audiobook. Learn English. Biography of Dostoevsky. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv9dQYVHSIA [Accessed 3 Oct. 2024].
Dostoevsky (1923). Letters from day of execution sentencing . [online] Available at: https://ia800902.us.archive.org/34/items/dostoevskyletter00dostuoft/dostoevskyletter00dostuoft.pdf.
Dostoevsky, F. (1914). All letters Dostoevsky wrote. [online] Available at: https://ia801302.us.archive.org/6/items/lettersoffyodorm00dostuoft/lettersoffyodorm00dostuoft.pdf.
Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Ginsburg, M. (1974). Notes from Underground ... Newly Translated by Mirra Ginsburg. Introduction by Donald Fanger.
George, S. (2012). From the gambler within: Dostoyevsky’s The Gambler. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 18(3), pp.226–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.111.008995.
Greyson, B. (2014). Getting Comfortable With Near Death Experiences: An Overview of Near-Death Experiences. Missouri Medicine, [online] 110(6), pp.475–481. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6179792/ [Accessed 23 Dec. 2024].
Grier, D. (2012). Irwin Weil on Dostoevsky. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayh-ehvFVfU.
Grossman, N. (n.d.). On Materialism as Science Dogma" by Neal Grossman. [online] www.newdualism.org. Available at: https://www.newdualism.org/papers/N.Grossman/OnMaterialismasScienceDogma.html [Accessed 23 Dec. 2024].
L.G Kiloh (1985). The Epilepsy of Dostoevsky . [online] Google Scholar. Available at: https://web.math.princeton.edu/~sswang/literature_general_unsorted/kiloh-dostoevsky-epilepsy.pdf.
Mann, T. (1945). Dostoevsky in Moderation - Thomas Mann. [online] Scribd. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/doc/195155175/Dostoevsky-in-Moderation-Thomas-Mann [Accessed 27 Jan. 2025].
Marullo, T.G. (2017). Fyodor Dostoevsky—In the Beginning (1821–1845). [online] Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.co.jp/books?hl=en&lr&id=Hf_-DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=fyodor%20dostoyevsky%20life%20&ots=PXgJ9wLr8h&sig=d0wvXoDYv-l4ms4V9TAPf5uhVQk&redir_esc=y&authuser=0#v=onepage&q=fyodor%20dostoyevsky%20life&f=false [Accessed 17 Sep. 2024].
Mayne, E., Ghatto, L. and Windus (n.d.). Letters of Fyodor ;Michailovitch (Dostoevsky to his Family and Friends TRANSLATED BY. [online] Available at: https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Letters-of-Fyodor-Michailovitch-Dostoevsky-to-his-Family-and-Friends.pdf [Accessed 24 Nov. 2024].
P&L (2023). The Powerful Message of Dostoevsky’s ‘Notes From A Dead House’. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHbLysul0Zw [Accessed Jan. 2025].
Tényi, D., Gyimesi, C., Kovács, N., Tényi, T. and Janszky, J. (2016). The possible role of the insula in the epilepsy and the gambling disorder of Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(3), pp.542–547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.061.
THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD BY FEDOR DOSTOÏEFFSKY. (2011). Project Gutenberg. [online] 25 Sep. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37536/37536-h/37536-h.htm [Accessed 26 Nov. 2024].
The School of Life (2016). LITERATURE - Fyodor Dostoyevsky. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMmSdxZpseY [Accessed Nov. 2024].
thepearlreview (2020). Notes From A Dead House | The Magic of Dostoevsky Explained. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbQ_34S-g9c [Accessed 4 Nov. 2024].
Williams, R. (2014). Video & Audio: Lord Rowan Williams on Dostoevsky - Metadata. [online] Cam.ac.uk. Available at: https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/1654658 [Accessed 3 Oct. 2024].